From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-ports-return-2089-listarch-libc-ports=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 24196 invoked by alias); 11 Nov 2011 18:10:27 -0000
Received: (qmail 24180 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Nov 2011 18:10:26 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from toast.topped-with-meat.com (HELO topped-with-meat.com) (204.197.218.159)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 18:10:13 +0000
Received: by topped-with-meat.com (Postfix, from userid 5281)	id BB7752C0F8; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:10:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>
To: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>,    <libc-ports@sourceware.org>,    <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,    Arnd Bergmann	<arnd@arndb.de>,    Linas Vepstas <linas@codeaurora.org>,    Guan Xuetao	<gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>,    Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,    Chen Liqin	<liqin.chen@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/10] Tilera (and Linux asm-generic) support for glibc
In-Reply-To: Chris Metcalf's message of  Wednesday, 9 November 2011 23:26:45 -0500 <4EBB5285.1000808@tilera.com>
References: <201111100054.pAA0sf6u025585@farm-0002.internal.tilera.com>	<201111092314.34545.vapier@gentoo.org>	<4EBB5285.1000808@tilera.com>
Message-Id: <20111111181012.BB7752C0F8@topped-with-meat.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 18:10:00 -0000
X-CMAE-Score: 0
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=fe7WOzsF c=1 sm=1 a=XBVXW9dgWp8A:10		a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=CCpqsmhAAAAA:8 a=INK4VraRuvdaZgIwFhAA:9		a=Rb_WbRSsm6OLGR5iChkA:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=F9H0fRKWHuYA:10		a=WkljmVdYkabdwxfqvArNOQ==:117
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-ports.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-ports-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-ports@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-ports-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00025.txt.bz2

> Do you mean the Subject lines all being the same in the emails that make up 
> each patch set?  I almost gave them all different subject lines to match 
> the contents, but at the last minute "saved" myself by reading in the 
> sourceware glibc "Contribution checklist" wiki 
> (http://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Contribution%20checklist):

Those instructions are stupid.  Using a distinct and meaningful subject
line for each patch is the true convention.


Thanks,
Roland