From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-ports-return-2091-listarch-libc-ports=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 8541 invoked by alias); 11 Nov 2011 19:07:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 8522 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Nov 2011 19:07:04 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from toast.topped-with-meat.com (HELO topped-with-meat.com) (204.197.218.159)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:06:44 +0000
Received: by topped-with-meat.com (Postfix, from userid 5281)	id C37902C0F9; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 11:06:41 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>
To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos_odonell@mentor.com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,    Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>,    <libc-ports@sourceware.org>,    <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,    Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,    Linas Vepstas <linas@codeaurora.org>,    Guan Xuetao	<gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>,    Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,    Chen Liqin	<liqin.chen@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/10] Tilera (and Linux asm-generic) support for glibc
In-Reply-To: Carlos O'Donell's message of  Friday, 11 November 2011 13:35:02 -0500 <4EBD6AD6.805@mentor.com>
References: <201111100054.pAA0sf6u025585@farm-0002.internal.tilera.com>	<201111092314.34545.vapier@gentoo.org>	<4EBB5285.1000808@tilera.com>	<20111111181012.BB7752C0F8@topped-with-meat.com>	<4EBD6AD6.805@mentor.com>
Message-Id: <20111111190641.C37902C0F9@topped-with-meat.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:07:00 -0000
X-CMAE-Score: 0
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=fe7WOzsF c=1 sm=1 a=XBVXW9dgWp8A:10		a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=g_sBCfgl4Nu7Q8P9lJsA:9 a=cwwSk8W0sAw08424rnQA:7		a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=WkljmVdYkabdwxfqvArNOQ==:117
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-ports.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-ports-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-ports@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-ports-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00027.txt.bz2

> The instructions as written do not lack meaning or sense, but it does
> appear that they are inaccurate with respect to your ideals on the topic.

I didn't say "meaningless" or "nonsensical", I said "stupid", didn't I? ;-)

> Personally I like the use of a repeating prefix coupled with a meaningful
> subject line e.g. [PATCH 9/10] NPTL update: <Meaningful subject>.

I think that is fine, though I don't especially see the appeal.
The title of the group is what 0/n messages are for.


Thanks,
Roland