From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22108 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2012 14:24:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 22096 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jan 2012 14:24:49 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,LIBERO,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from outrelay07.libero.it (HELO outrelay07.libero.it) (212.52.84.111) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:24:35 +0000 X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0208.4F19791E.00F4,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-libjamoibt: 1823 Received: from hermes (151.77.205.221) by outrelay07.libero.it (8.5.140) (authenticated as acrux_it@libero.it) id 4F16F104004DC2D2; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:24:30 +0100 Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:24:00 -0000 From: acrux To: "Carlos O'Donell" Cc: libc-ports@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: 405/440/464/476 support and optimizations Message-Id: <20120120152428.df02fbc4.acrux_it@libero.it> In-Reply-To: References: <1283448864.3854.56.camel@gargoyle> <1283526020.3854.77.camel@gargoyle> <1286218436.3679.1.camel@gargoyle> <1292271927.3622.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <33163939.post@talk.nabble.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00038.txt.bz2 On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:34:50 -0500 "Carlos O'Donell" wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:30 PM, acrux@cruxppc.org > wrote: > > > > just tried to build glibc-2.13 "--with-cpu=3D440 --with-fp" on a > > Sam440ep[1] (PPC440EP SoC [2]) but it remains stuck in this point: > > CPP=3D'gcc -m32 -E -x c-header' > > =A0/home/999/new/work/src/build32/elf/ld.so.1 > > --library-path > > /home/999/new/work/src/build32:/home/999/new/work/src/build32/math:/hom= e/999/new/work/src/build32/elf:/home/999/new/work/src/build32/dlfcn:/home/9= 99/new/work/src/build32/nss:/home/999/new/work/src/build32/nis:/home/999/ne= w/work/src/build32/rt:/home/999/new/work/src/build32/resolv:/home/999/new/w= ork/src/build32/crypt:/home/999/new/work/src/build32/nptl > > /home/999/new/work/src/build32/sunrpc/rpcgen -Y ../scripts -c > > rpcsvc/bootparam_prot.x -o > > /home/999/new/work/src/build32/sunrpc/xbootparam_prot.T >=20 > This is the first use of the newly build dynamic loader. >=20 > A failure here means that the dynamic loader has not been correctly > compiled. >=20 > You should debug this to figure out what is going wrong in the loader. >=20 i know, but i've no resource and i guess not enough skill to debug and fix it.=20 As i received a borda with a 440EP SoC, just only for fun, i tested a build "--with-cpu=3D440 --with-fp". I'd like to know if somobody really tested these features. > > Here my config.log: http://cruxppc.org/~acrux/config.log > > Instead i successfully built glibc-2.13 without "--with-cpu=3D440 > > --with-fp" . I'm using an updated CRUX PPC 2.7 (32bit): gcc-4.5.3, > > binutils-2.21.1, glibc-2.12.2 >=20 > Have you tested your compiler? What were the test results? >=20 > Did you test binutils? What were the test results? >=20 they finished their testsuites with only the well know failures for their own releases. Thus i can say they are good. best, --nico --=20 GNU/Linux on Power Architecture CRUX PPC - http://cruxppc.org/