From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26490 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2012 07:48:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 26477 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Apr 2012 07:48:09 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:47:58 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3C7lWsx028695 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 12 Apr 2012 03:47:32 -0400 Received: from tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com (tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com [10.16.42.4]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3C7lV2M019258 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 12 Apr 2012 03:47:32 -0400 Received: from tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com (tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com [127.0.0.1]) by tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3C7lUNr008127; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:47:30 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id q3C7lTF0008125; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 09:47:29 +0200 Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:48:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Riku Voipio Cc: Michael Hope , cross-distro@lists.linaro.org, Adam Conrad , linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org, Steve McIntyre , Jeff Law , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, libc-ports@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Phone call (was Re: Armhf dynamic linker path) Message-ID: <20120412074729.GJ16117@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <201204100019.13472.vapier@gentoo.org> <4F83B5AD.3010302@redhat.com> <201204100033.08853.vapier@gentoo.org> <4F83B939.10205@redhat.com> <4F84AC96.6020500@redhat.com> <20120411010608.GC25263@einval.com> <20120411223755.GD25263@einval.com> <20120412060523.GI16117@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2 On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:33:08AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > On 12 April 2012 09:05, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:22:13AM +1200, Michael Hope wrote: > >> All good.  My vote is for /lib/ld-arm-linux-gnueabihf.so.3 as it: > > > > The directory should be /libhf/ or /libhfp/ for that for consistency > > with all the other architectures.  Note e.g. x86_64 dynamic linker > > is /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2, not /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2. > > For some value of consistency. x86_64, mips64, powerpc64 and sparc64 > install to /lib64. But on ia64 it is /lib/ld-linux-ia64.so.2 and on ia64 installs in /lib, because it isn't a multilibbed architecture. > s390x it is /lib/ld64.so.1 [1]. Ok, I forgot about this, I've tried to convince s390x folks to move it to /lib64/ld64.so.1 many years ago, but that just didn't happen, so /lib/ld64.so.1 is just a symlink to /lib64/ld64.so.1. Upstream glibc binaries use /lib64/ld64.so.1 as their dynamic linker, while all other packages use /lib/ld64.so.1 as that is hardcoded in gcc. That is an argument that perhaps /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3 could be acceptable too, as it would follow the s390x model, I wouldn't be terribly happy about that, but I could live with that. Jakub