From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4436 invoked by alias); 19 May 2012 22:38:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 4376 invoked by uid 22791); 19 May 2012 22:38:30 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net (HELO shards.monkeyblade.net) (198.137.202.13) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 May 2012 22:38:17 +0000 Received: from localhost (cpe-66-108-119-99.nyc.res.rr.com [66.108.119.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by shards.monkeyblade.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4JMcEfb011509 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 19 May 2012 15:38:15 -0700 Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 22:38:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20120519.183813.1716277143511006516.davem@davemloft.net> To: roland@hack.frob.com Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, libc-ports@sourceware.org, rth@twiddle.net Subject: Re: foo.s From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20120519051409.CE5002C083@topped-with-meat.com> References: <20120519.003852.1167279910667363123.davem@davemloft.net> <20120519051409.CE5002C083@topped-with-meat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00118.txt.bz2 From: Roland McGrath Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 22:14:09 -0700 (PDT) >> It looks like only Alpha and HPPA have foo.s files any longer. > > Then libc-ports is the place that needs to hear the request (CC'd). > >> I did a quick scan over them in the glibc-ports tree and I see no >> reason why changing them all over to foo.S would break things. > > I can't imagine how it would. (Actually I can, if there are foo.s files > using identifiers that $(compile-command.S) predefines. But it doesn't > seem inordinately likely--who would be as foolish as i686?) Carlos just took care of HPPA and therefore only Alpha is left. Richard, could I trouble you do do the "foo.s --> foo.S" renames for Alpha and do a test build? I'd really appreciate it. Once that's taken care of I'll post and commit the mainline patch to get rid of the .s prefix rules.