From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-ports-return-2696-listarch-libc-ports=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 13861 invoked by alias); 23 May 2012 08:01:51 -0000
Received: (qmail 13852 invoked by uid 22791); 23 May 2012 08:01:49 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FRT_OFFER2,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from cantor2.suse.de (HELO mx2.suse.de) (195.135.220.15)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 May 2012 08:01:20 +0000
Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254])	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AFE997FF6;	Wed, 23 May 2012 10:01:18 +0200 (CEST)
From: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.com>
To: cross-distro@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Use different linker path for hardfloat ABI
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 08:01:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.4.0-1-desktop; KDE/4.8.3; x86_64; ; )
Cc: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>,	Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>,	"Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@systemhalted.org>,	GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,	"libc-ports@sourceware.org" <libc-ports@sourceware.org>
References: <CANLjY-kZ6FakmtKkHjjC2YNgCBkydiNq8F81Fb7SgW0RE6iF5w@mail.gmail.com> <4FBC8DCB.6020006@suse.com> <4FBC982F.7040403@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FBC982F.7040403@arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <201205231001.17818.aj@suse.com>
Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-ports.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-ports-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-ports@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-ports-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2

On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 09:56:31 Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> [...]
> This is a behaviour change.  It would need RM approval for a release
> branch.
>=20
> R.

There was agreement by all pushing for the change to use it. So, let's ask=
=20
the release managers about their opinion,

Andreas
--=20
 Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
  SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany
   GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imend=F6rffer,HRB16746 (AG N=FCrnberg)
    GPG fingerprint =3D 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126