From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5463 invoked by alias); 23 May 2012 14:15:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 5442 invoked by uid 22791); 23 May 2012 14:15:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_PGP_SIGNED,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (HELO smtp.gentoo.org) (140.211.166.183) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 May 2012 14:15:19 +0000 Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F95E1B400A; Wed, 23 May 2012 14:15:18 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger To: libc-ports@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Use different linker path for hardfloat ABI Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 14:15:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.4.0; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Richard Guenther , Andreas Jaeger , cross-distro@lists.linaro.org, Richard Earnshaw , "Carlos O'Donell" , GCC Patches References: <201205231001.17818.aj@suse.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3494291.3VHHH9ihsi"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201205231016.29997.vapier@gentoo.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00140.txt.bz2 --nextPart3494291.3VHHH9ihsi Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 798 On Wednesday 23 May 2012 04:17:51 Richard Guenther wrote: > On Wed, 23 May 2012, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 09:56:31 Richard Earnshaw wrote: > > > [...] > > > This is a behaviour change. It would need RM approval for a release > > > branch. > > >=20 > > > R. > >=20 > > There was agreement by all pushing for the change to use it. So, let's > > ask the release managers about their opinion, >=20 > I'm ok with the change - but of course only to carry one less patch > in our local tree. What do others think? It would definitely (anyway) > need documenting in changes.html (for both 4.7.1 and 4.8). i've done this for Gentoo and 4.5.0+, so if all the distros are going to be= =20 doing this in 4.7.x anyways, makes sense to me to do it in the official bra= nch. -mike --nextPart3494291.3VHHH9ihsi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-length: 836 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJPvPE9AAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBE5EQAOHPwQvWfCrxzookEJCsgNwX ONyWa9ijdL90+thZTAFqCiQHSA9nCfnSOj5a4GlI9xD4LMcVvtS0ZWYmsFj9IW64 HrRPLR4w5Z1XM4nUCA+l5VYucMnisMRU4u3amwun1uhnBN2YuAopOoOwAZw+C4WL q4BLXRF/Um5u69RcCubcSFxtBebCSQT2g8sOFMNgW818JZOlEa+FC7GD1lXinb9z h/+jCLak0/OoFGcnUH4pYEMmgxeq11mZ3jEbWGR19+a5acjo6Ce/zOjCRDeizopp hJUfX9Y/YGxzHWUrSpf2lkeI0fOgs2lptgFPNpBSHt3wpCwyKpg+IvNTEb6rrwpr hiKviahr/ZC1hGZnL1giV57GvAXO0JfO2i7IFNsPg4XRHbLnSG2U8azxZldSb1n4 tE+l0bTpVe4FVmCf6PJiXOQi1mTgs6xQP+0N8ToBR9pbp5RufA4bTmr68uOaQ1Bc Q+exGOrKL1Czb+1aylJ4S3vvbYTC5AP3UXCQDnAZjxCTNHn7oeVuu3k4+3rtRc3A 3fYP/Cskf4IDVS5XiWpPWzP1E9fct5j+rbcaXN/LzEWE4zlBZR/jNMEGft0lorka ZaVmAYitB0X2gS4Cj+U9Eihx6cSU0kb7dJNIZu4w+hogmkPrd5ot6Hleqnee/jhl pKp/7QD7Rz1mp4PLVXCx =J/Qz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3494291.3VHHH9ihsi--