From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5789 invoked by alias); 24 May 2012 04:08:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 5781 invoked by uid 22791); 24 May 2012 04:08:47 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_PGP_SIGNED,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (HELO smtp.gentoo.org) (140.211.166.183) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 May 2012 04:08:34 +0000 Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BDD51B402C; Thu, 24 May 2012 04:08:33 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger To: Michael Hope Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Use different linker path for hardfloat ABI Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 04:08:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.4.0; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: libc-ports@sourceware.org, cross-distro@lists.linaro.org, Richard Guenther , Richard Earnshaw , "Carlos O'Donell" , GCC Patches , Andreas Jaeger References: <201205231016.29997.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4514969.rcjIxsi8oh"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201205240009.49015.vapier@gentoo.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00145.txt.bz2 --nextPart4514969.rcjIxsi8oh Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 1656 On Wednesday 23 May 2012 17:11:53 Michael Hope wrote: > On 24 May 2012 02:16, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Wednesday 23 May 2012 04:17:51 Richard Guenther wrote: > >> On Wed, 23 May 2012, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > >> > On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 09:56:31 Richard Earnshaw wrote: > >> > > [...] > >> > > This is a behaviour change. It would need RM approval for a relea= se > >> > > branch. > >> > >=20 > >> > > R. > >> >=20 > >> > There was agreement by all pushing for the change to use it. So, let= 's > >> > ask the release managers about their opinion, > >>=20 > >> I'm ok with the change - but of course only to carry one less patch > >> in our local tree. What do others think? It would definitely (anyway) > >> need documenting in changes.html (for both 4.7.1 and 4.8). > >=20 > > i've done this for Gentoo and 4.5.0+, so if all the distros are going to > > be doing this in 4.7.x anyways, makes sense to me to do it in the > > official branch. >=20 > Agreed. Google have done it for their 4.6, Fedora have done it for > 4.7 (?), and we've done it for Linaro GCC 4.6 and 4.7. >=20 > My concern is that a point release of GCC would stop working against > the latest release of GLIBC. >=20 > I'm happy to prepare a backport to GCC 4.6, GCC 4.7, and GLIBC 2.15 so > the next set of point releases will all work with each other. This > would match what the distros are doing. http://sources.gentoo.org/gentoo/src/patchsets/gcc/4.6.3/gentoo/33_all_armh= f.patch http://sources.gentoo.org/gentoo/src/patchsets/gcc/4.7.0/gentoo/33_all_armh= f.patch http://sources.gentoo.org/gentoo/src/patchsets/glibc/2.15/6226_all_arm-glib= c-2.15-hardfp.patch -mike --nextPart4514969.rcjIxsi8oh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-length: 836 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJPvbSMAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBNXEP+wYTzC0z58N1kU/K0dX6QqKD LBqRdy0W1cwdf2NGmtSgCo+KsWntRtBmA5HAi3/TvtT2BQLWWscOj2Ctg22kx7JW v5NyuO3NjPiaYpu5TQ4w1uex2qZUoZk4FHWoxJ3JrvK1KlJ15yS9NlkfYCYNXewP 1SDEoyAsOJ/SSwCq0abtfiAp1qGolFDGW4I+XsOXjMbpgW2KOxmL7NuUOUsMYm3x XfSBl1kHYm2wIsI3F5KlsffH/saZjvfRj2BwzB10Mg4AMRCQdYdaCu1wNSLX500l PxuAlzDaT4gKn57cAHYFwgsf197eeg2gJ8LOLguo3kNhcRAWcRYvb35exJqk8Tm8 rJ302m80Uf3l7KnWtHLoTtExE86E5NUYaCcDEqyu6Gb6Y/kce+ZIqdc5hdD8diXI 5ynxMP0KG1c9zco0yOvhup/sOKg/HKDs99b2Pk973hmbJT6U3+LfYLiIr3h6eMSJ 7cpdo4ojC4d0ComRBYz4wQWIqwQKi+jhtBwqNtTKktWikxpxFvcFSTC/i+f99OaE rKb/nVrKxDGc43GVsfYBjeha7p68kyNdyk6gdE4jDlsWnDGIwEVrZX2du/s1oJfh SumWRDRsmN1+x8GLPNPwDaM+7TOgPucthUUo7zCJIsojlfte45XQAxin3/tXr5v8 Qv23DumB4LB6/2xmba9+ =JVbe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4514969.rcjIxsi8oh--