From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23831 invoked by alias); 24 May 2012 17:08:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 23712 invoked by uid 22791); 24 May 2012 17:08:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 May 2012 17:08:12 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4OH7jwl011098 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 24 May 2012 13:07:45 -0400 Received: from tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com (tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com [10.16.42.4]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4OH7i3g010905 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 24 May 2012 13:07:44 -0400 Received: from tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com (tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com [127.0.0.1]) by tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4OH7daF015252; Thu, 24 May 2012 19:07:39 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id q4OH7bO1015250; Thu, 24 May 2012 19:07:37 +0200 Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 17:08:00 -0000 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Richard Guenther Cc: Andreas Jaeger , cross-distro@lists.linaro.org, Richard Earnshaw , "Carlos O'Donell" , GCC Patches , "libc-ports@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Use different linker path for hardfloat ABI Message-ID: <20120524170737.GR16117@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <4FBC8DCB.6020006@suse.com> <4FBC982F.7040403@arm.com> <201205231001.17818.aj@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00149.txt.bz2 On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:17:51AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Wed, 23 May 2012, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > > On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 09:56:31 Richard Earnshaw wrote: > > > [...] > > > This is a behaviour change. It would need RM approval for a release > > > branch. > > > > > > R. > > > > There was agreement by all pushing for the change to use it. So, let's ask > > the release managers about their opinion, > > I'm ok with the change - but of course only to carry one less patch > in our local tree. What do others think? It would definitely (anyway) > need documenting in changes.html (for both 4.7.1 and 4.8). I'm ok with that change as well (again, would apply that too), but note that it isn't effortless on the side of gcc users, with the patch in they either need recent enough glibc, or at least make a compatiblity symlink. Jakub