From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-ports-return-2789-listarch-libc-ports=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 8300 invoked by alias); 1 Jun 2012 20:32:22 -0000
Received: (qmail 8282 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Jun 2012 20:32:19 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from toast.topped-with-meat.com (HELO topped-with-meat.com) (204.197.218.159)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 20:32:06 +0000
Received: by topped-with-meat.com (Postfix, from userid 5281)	id 153242C0A1; Fri,  1 Jun 2012 13:32:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,    GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,    libc-ports@sourceware.org,    Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>,    Kaz Kojima <kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp>,    Andreas Krebbel <Andreas.Krebbel@de.ibm.com>,    David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: RFA: Port maintainers: Convert WORDSIZE[32|64]/ld to abi-variants
In-Reply-To: Joseph S. Myers's message of  Friday, 1 June 2012 20:15:36 +0000 <Pine.LNX.4.64.1206012014530.11593@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
References: <20120526133641.GA9655@intel.com>	<Pine.LNX.4.64.1205261648450.16948@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>	<CAMe9rOouyXcgkBAkRF+XV2m2icHh3tAWOkMCLLd5LA8=qQkqMw@mail.gmail.com>	<Pine.LNX.4.64.1205261919230.16948@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>	<CAMe9rOpV=AgDvj91D06Bgr4Q_k5B1PGFDN4LK1OquVkx+b0yUw@mail.gmail.com>	<Pine.LNX.4.64.1205311513500.7338@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>	<CAMe9rOpUEDRrvh1hXQJqut_uvyitfUs7sn+72fQ5W=fdE2GP3g@mail.gmail.com>	<Pine.LNX.4.64.1206011404100.2129@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>	<CAMe9rOr0WQgOFXOac8PzYHZk9DeiZ2OSmJEG7tgq0bJ0CFUQLA@mail.gmail.com>	<Pine.LNX.4.64.1206011506140.2129@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>	<CAMe9rOrcO6zg-9Gc8hkEjeK=wBWxNe_o7Ut+=gqsb_5Oyj=Wbg@mail.gmail.com>	<Pine.LNX.4.64.1206012014530.11593@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
Message-Id: <20120601203206.153242C0A1@topped-with-meat.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 20:32:00 -0000
X-CMAE-Score: 0
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=e8d9udV/ c=1 sm=1 a=Pez_beSCaL4A:10		a=Z6MIti7PxpgA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=hOe2yjtxAAAA:8 a=14OXPxybAAAA:8		a=9ZtUivvKsgcn56Q9lgAA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=WkljmVdYkabdwxfqvArNOQ==:117
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-ports.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-ports-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-ports@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-ports-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2

> Any comments on the patch to sysdeps makefiles, which is the one actually 
> needed to fix the installation of stubs.h for those architectures?

Those changes look fine to me, though comments wouldn't hurt (they can just
refer to Makeconfig, I guess).  Of course, it's the powerpc, sparc, and
s390 maintainers whose reactions really matter.  But since the status quo
now is that we've regressed the situation for them and this fairly
obviously fixes it or at least won't make it worse, I don't think you need
to wait for everybody to chime in.


Thanks,
Roland