From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27945 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2012 17:31:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 27928 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jun 2012 17:31:00 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_PGP_SIGNED,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (HELO smtp.gentoo.org) (140.211.166.183) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 17:30:45 +0000 Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DECE01B4018; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 17:30:42 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Request for help: Fix building tarballs for ports add-on. Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 17:31:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.4.0; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Roland McGrath , "Joseph S. Myers" , "Carlos O'Donell" , libc-ports@sourceware.org References: <4FD92B99.3050605@mentor.com> <20120614164730.CA15D2C0A4@topped-with-meat.com> In-Reply-To: <20120614164730.CA15D2C0A4@topped-with-meat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1573162.n5QMmaYIHI"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201206141330.44794.vapier@gentoo.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00040.txt.bz2 --nextPart1573162.n5QMmaYIHI Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 636 On Thursday 14 June 2012 12:47:30 Roland McGrath wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Jun 2012, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > I've been thinking that right after 2.16 will be a good time to > > > consolidate the repositories (just the initial step, making it ports/ > > > under the libc tree). > >=20 > > We'll need to work out if that comes with any change to expectations > > regarding what people update in global changes. >=20 > I propose that the repository consolidation have no immediate ramificatio= ns > other than on the use of one repository rather than two. Further changes > can be done incrementally and discussed on their own. +1 -mike --nextPart1573162.n5QMmaYIHI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-length: 836 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJP2h/EAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WB0tcQAK8DuOdpjFZ3Ea/BfwiCj+fj NXZTBq6fFJgYiDzwPIn0FxVfkPVtTZPaybLFPw1IHfs87ZVPGMYypp+fX9cdN7nu zl8v48+BS+YFHGovPWUWC352LNJR4nUDXE5RbYvvBhltL0Z4ozvHjF/L3+OEzA76 HiIM+xwVosIf0/lcMO2Bg36Q7xB65brWO52X9GJ3W5rBA3IPMclYlGYqNx2L/05O iG7xR1OOKgEoRXunXqke1/So6WQ+SZYOQS1Nn2N7PadTtm+aeMbZvKPtooDM7wNy ctIemBXOIgnnDA2jQ3Ev6vhF7qv0gck16NixI1EtQ1GVfMQm0aG8ek4eNt6fx+Q6 8X3CSZpBvBhMsAOH/Wz66BNpER+aoRS9No2z7hMojALpOJ2pXIp5c/wkWxpeJbcF LZWES7baHIWy9+QhU2N37KWbh5h13O5DILBbWeBuvYyipuQiL0/+BGnRsjixFUW6 ih31VqsLvi6oBXhaGIvRuclt5zQj0UqjvZhvuVzzg2nHm+1guvGQMoa4BGTWEF9g 00GUfUNBz3/24/CyGp0anY4dTTjUVOYIIXaOLA8rdliopkml1U7A3ndcP5j89Hs1 yAG4Z19HMGAaoR2evuI1agkyQ3JezPWZVeQJKxr5BwXj1OAkBHp+/ORstJ09A2hP B7gTfZlyU6CoB3+WwWeW =dVct -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1573162.n5QMmaYIHI--