From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-ports-return-2952-listarch-libc-ports=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 14311 invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2012 20:28:51 -0000
Received: (qmail 14286 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jul 2012 20:28:46 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,SARE_SUB_GETRID,TW_BJ,TW_FC
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from toast.topped-with-meat.com (HELO topped-with-meat.com) (204.197.218.159)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 20:28:33 +0000
Received: by topped-with-meat.com (Postfix, from userid 5281)	id 25E832C109; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 13:28:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>
To: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org,    libc-ports <libc-ports@sourceware.org>,    Kaz Kojima <kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp>,    Andreas Krebbel <krebbel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,    David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Get rid of ASM_TYPE_DIRECTIVE{,_PREFIX}
In-Reply-To: Marek Polacek's message of  Friday, 27 July 2012 21:18:49 +0200 <20120727191849.GJ3311@redhat.com>
References: <20120727191849.GJ3311@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20120727202833.25E832C109@topped-with-meat.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 20:28:00 -0000
X-CMAE-Score: 0
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=e8d9udV/ c=1 sm=1 a=gw4gIYRKth8A:10		a=Z6MIti7PxpgA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=hOe2yjtxAAAA:8 a=14OXPxybAAAA:8		a=6reOXS8uVSiRiLRFCE4A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=WkljmVdYkabdwxfqvArNOQ==:117
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-ports.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-ports-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-ports@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-ports-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00074.txt.bz2

I only skimmed but this all looks fine to me.  For paranoia's sake, since
this should not change anything, please check that no code changed for i?86
and x86_64 (eu-elfcmp might suffice, or else objdump -d comparisons).
It should still wait for at least two of sh, powerpc, s390 to report
testing ok.  But since this is so mechanical and simple, I'd say if they
are slow (like past the middle of next week, say), commit it anyway and
just remind folks they still need to test.


Thanks,
Roland