From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23231 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2012 18:51:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 23220 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Aug 2012 18:51:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_PGP_SIGNED,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (HELO smtp.gentoo.org) (140.211.166.183) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 18:50:51 +0000 Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E211B403A; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 18:50:50 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger To: "Joseph S. Myers" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm: handle unaligned ABS relocs Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 18:51:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.5.0; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: libc-ports@sourceware.org, Richard Henderson References: <201112121920.17908.vapier@gentoo.org> <201208121034.47592.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart27468226.xSdNYuvZ2l"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201208121450.51011.vapier@gentoo.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00112.txt.bz2 --nextPart27468226.xSdNYuvZ2l Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 734 On Sunday 12 August 2012 11:55:32 Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Sun, 12 Aug 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Sunday 12 August 2012 09:00:50 Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > > On Sun, 12 Aug 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > 2012-08-12 Mike Frysinger > > > >=20 > > > > * sysdeps/arm/dl-machine.h (elf_machine_rel) [R_ARM_ABS32]: Declare > > > > a new unaligned struct. Cast reloc_addr to that when updating the > > > > value it points to. > > >=20 > > > OK, presuming you've tested that this does indeed fix the described > > > problem. > >=20 > > i verified it compiles warning free. the original reporter verified it > > fixed the issue that he was seeing. >=20 > Thanks. The patch is OK. pushed then -mike --nextPart27468226.xSdNYuvZ2l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-length: 836 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJQJ/sKAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBZfsP+wdxc0bvSzCjiDmbIleHIOmK hu9byBLwyQGtP1dbo7N4MW4cRo3O8JQBrCgJ2c9ZWiuwgl3zEf9LZN5E25i99l7O PATGdL4OB2cDYT6tsACHqAhx2M5I/6yuKWZeeHkQooC0PP+WdU8z6GfHwFllOE9j ls+TGJZMYVbuqX85l+Vw+8AIml8kQnFgSNj97uCS6tn04NcMezVj6EBs4rw7WrxC ry7G+SwdV3cqjQQ+kog0WgeuRQccZrtLXZm4a6SEMy3nXT2A0LY6gZsZ+5OPO4Go vDf2gfBIrnQQgoSRnfQi7DrfEG2deYiYX8TDdSGs5FlDdNqxyyWsTlI3W9wxP2ms 6fzEVc7EYSbQV5LblYJXxa2519g0mPdNgPQOFqAyNFrswNA+jOGyEx5tuGnOWi+e 80jS/2ekVqeqX9T9Sk+XYIcs9V+n2q+Z9tLrzZNAVDrdY+R4z5X3KhXDi3EiuPkw kRWjW4B7rTFk3UU2ojiC8mqHh7qfXNHEWQ34ZEqtUoix4EQeo2Q8LaIP0LT7Og72 4da9JG4GeIXq9cxa7HIrEqgAQWrXfkzZ+N3wKgsi3w+ritbXDdRpOl/nkGDFbrk3 vZJjFuyLa+Z+p4Gy3e5zMlTKkLjzI74pvWaj9anrn7aG2FWEPoaSVij9ifWMdjJ+ X0ZIvDbcTPn99SILg7Ca =ck4Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart27468226.xSdNYuvZ2l--