From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-ports-return-3313-listarch-libc-ports=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 30598 invoked by alias); 25 Oct 2012 16:38:35 -0000
Received: (qmail 30274 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Oct 2012 16:38:31 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_PGP_SIGNED,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (HELO smtp.gentoo.org) (140.211.166.183)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:38:25 +0000
Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3CA33D888;	Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:38:24 +0000 (UTC)
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
To: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.com>
Subject: Re: Patch: Convert ia64 to use <bits/fcntl-linux.h>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:38:00 -0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.6.3; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; )
Cc: "libc-ports@sourceware.org" <libc-ports@sourceware.org>
References: <50883CBE.60805@suse.com> <201210241628.04405.vapier@gentoo.org> <5088D6E6.9060001@suse.com>
In-Reply-To: <5088D6E6.9060001@suse.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;  boundary="nextPart1482682.Kzp9bmA0UV";  protocol="application/pgp-signature";  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201210251238.24279.vapier@gentoo.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-ports.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-ports-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-ports@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-ports-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00089.txt.bz2


--nextPart1482682.Kzp9bmA0UV
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-length: 168

On Thursday 25 October 2012 02:06:30 Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Thus, may I add the current patch (with the removal of F_GETLK etc) for
> Itanium?

yep, that's fine
-mike

--nextPart1482682.Kzp9bmA0UV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Content-length: 836

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
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=adD8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1482682.Kzp9bmA0UV--