From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7512 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2012 23:00:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 7488 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Oct 2012 23:00:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from toast.topped-with-meat.com (HELO topped-with-meat.com) (204.197.218.159) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 23:00:12 +0000 Received: by topped-with-meat.com (Postfix, from userid 5281) id C2B4D2C07C; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 16:00:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland McGrath To: "Joseph S. Myers" Cc: Steve Ellcey , Andreas Schwab , Subject: Re: [patch, mips] Fix stubs files for hard float vs. soft float In-Reply-To: Joseph S. Myers's message of Friday, 26 October 2012 22:11:26 +0000 References: <1350342376.2044.41.camel@ubuntu-sellcey> <1350948702.15035.5.camel@ubuntu-sellcey> <1351023590.15035.14.camel@ubuntu-sellcey> <20121023213216.B0F222C0A2@topped-with-meat.com> <1351030448.15035.25.camel@ubuntu-sellcey> <20121023224821.DA5B52C09F@topped-with-meat.com> <1351095503.15035.45.camel@ubuntu-sellcey> <1351098761.15035.52.camel@ubuntu-sellcey> <20121024172501.AA6E52C0A5@topped-with-meat.com> <1351123186.15035.57.camel@ubuntu-sellcey> <1351285554.15035.94.camel@ubuntu-sellcey> Message-Id: <20121026230010.C2B4D2C07C@topped-with-meat.com> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 23:00:00 -0000 X-CMAE-Score: 0 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=LtfpOghc c=1 sm=1 a=-COW8kBwH0IA:10 a=Z6MIti7PxpgA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=hOe2yjtxAAAA:8 a=14OXPxybAAAA:8 a=MSnT7BQQMx0A:10 a=quTSM-xGarf8E6YOr8EA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=WkljmVdYkabdwxfqvArNOQ==:117 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00101.txt.bz2 > OK with those changes if Roland doesn't see any other problems. I didn't look at the last version closely. The essential style of the configure check is about right, and if the rest looks fine to you then it's probably all fine.