From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28284 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2013 01:26:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 28271 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jan 2013 01:26:35 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from arrakis.dune.hu (HELO eddie.linux-mips.org) (78.24.191.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 01:26:30 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:44488 "EHLO linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S6820301Ab3A3B02KuHoI (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jan 2013 02:26:28 +0100 Received: from scotty.linux-mips.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0U1QOot018277; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 02:26:24 +0100 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r0U1QN0h018276; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 02:26:23 +0100 Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 01:26:00 -0000 From: Ralf Baechle To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: Mike Frysinger , libc-ports@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][BZ #15054] MIPS: Fix syscall wrappers for syscall restart support Message-ID: <20130130012623.GD24911@linux-mips.org> References: <201301230009.23864.vapier@gentoo.org> <201301231317.34359.vapier@gentoo.org> <20130129190418.GC24911@linux-mips.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00082.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 07:12:29PM +0000, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > The linux-mips.org kernel tree contains backports of this patch to all > > -stable branches all the way back to 2.6.16. > > Good to know, thanks. This means we won't have to be concerned about > this issue once we have stopped supporting kernel versions below 2.6.36. You may want to update the comments of your proposed libc patch to reflect the 96187fb0bc30cd7919759d371d810e928048249d fix. What is the minimum kernel version required for current libcs? Ralf