From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32318 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2013 12:45:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 32296 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Feb 2013 12:45:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from cheddar.halon.org.uk (HELO cheddar.halon.org.uk) (217.10.144.130) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 12:45:10 +0000 Received: from bsmtp by cheddar.halon.org.uk with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U3Qqg-0007hY-N8; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 12:45:06 +0000 Received: from steve by tack.local with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1U3Qps-0005rr-Jp; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 12:44:16 +0000 Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 12:45:00 -0000 From: Steve McIntyre To: Carlos O'Donell Cc: libc-ports@sourceware.org, GNU C Library , "Joseph S. Myers" , Brendan Conoboy Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Fix transitional issues with ld.so.cache. Message-ID: <20130207124409.GA18557@einval.com> References: <511337DE.9000802@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <511337DE.9000802@redhat.com> X-attached: none User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2 On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 12:13:02AM -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > >The patch does the following: > >(a) Adds FLAG_ARM_LIBSF as a new ldconfig flag and adjusts > the verbose cache printout to list `,soft-float' when > this flag is set and distinguishing from "Don't know." > >(b) Sets FLAG_ARM_LIBSF for any object with the ELF flag > EF_ARM_ABI_FLOAT_SOFT. > >(c) Expands the conditions in _dl_cache_check to allow > hard-float and soft-float dynamic loaders to load > unmarked don't know / don't care objects. Looks spot-on to me, thanks. It's exactly the same method I was going to propose for the fix. I've not (yet) built and tested directly myself, but it sounds like your own testing is good for that. I'd also +1 the request to add this to a stable release as a clear bug fix. Cheers, -- Steve McIntyre steve.mcintyre@linaro.org Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs