From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-ports-return-3780-listarch-libc-ports=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 23513 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2013 21:16:18 -0000
Received: (qmail 23482 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Feb 2013 21:16:12 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from toast.topped-with-meat.com (HELO topped-with-meat.com) (204.197.218.159)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 21:16:08 +0000
Received: by topped-with-meat.com (Postfix, from userid 5281)	id 597EC2C0A5; Thu, 28 Feb 2013 13:16:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Cc: <libc-ports@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH roland/arm-avoid-r9] ARM: Use r10 instead of r9.
In-Reply-To: Joseph S. Myers's message of  Thursday, 28 February 2013 16:54:19 +0000 <Pine.LNX.4.64.1302281651580.5096@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
References: <20130228010102.162DD2C0A1@topped-with-meat.com>	<Pine.LNX.4.64.1302281651580.5096@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
Message-Id: <20130228211607.597EC2C0A5@topped-with-meat.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 21:16:00 -0000
X-CMAE-Score: 0
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=LYSvtFvi c=1 sm=1 tr=0		a=WkljmVdYkabdwxfqvArNOQ==:117 a=14OXPxybAAAA:8 a=PR7RcknsEoIA:10		a=Z6MIti7PxpgA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=hOe2yjtxAAAA:8 a=0iZI8_eQER4A:10		a=T-skT4ehQwKTLQGIw9MA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-ports.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-ports-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-ports@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-ports-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00137.txt.bz2

> looks like it should be r5-r8, r10.  How was this patch tested?

Oops, I caught most of those cases but missed the last couple.
Now fixed on the branch.

I haven't done any testing at all yet.  I wanted to make sure you didn't
have some broader objection to the change before I dealt with getting set
up to do arm-linux-gnueabi builds and test runs.  If you're not willing to
approve on eyeball validation alone (which is eminently reasonable, of
course), then I'll get my testing setup in order before asking again.

(I also had intended to let Richard's changes settle before I really tried
to get mine in, too.  I'll have many more assembly changes related to
arm-nacl porting, and this was only the simplest one I did first.)


Thanks,
Roland