public inbox for
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roland McGrath <>
To: Will Newton <>
Subject: Re: ARM per-thread stack protector
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 22:01:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Will Newton's message of  Monday, 22 July 2013 10:15:13 +0100 <>

> Thanks for the clarification. So the two methods are functionally identical?

Yes.  Where you keep the value is just a matter of optimal implementation
convenience for the particular machine.

> >From what I understand then all that is missing on ARM from that list
> is pointer mangling support?

I have no new information.

      reply	other threads:[~2013-07-22 22:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-19 16:34 Will Newton
2013-07-19 21:41 ` Roland McGrath
2013-07-22  9:15   ` Will Newton
2013-07-22 22:01     ` Roland McGrath [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).