From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11925 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2013 22:01:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 11845 invoked by uid 89); 22 Jul 2013 22:01:08 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KHOP_THREADED,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Unknown (HELO topped-with-meat.com) (204.197.218.159) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 22:01:08 +0000 Received: by topped-with-meat.com (Postfix, from userid 5281) id A1AD62C06F; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:01:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland McGrath To: Will Newton Cc: libc-ports@sourceware.org Subject: Re: ARM per-thread stack protector In-Reply-To: Will Newton's message of Monday, 22 July 2013 10:15:13 +0100 References: <20130719214113.EDAD02C0A1@topped-with-meat.com> Message-Id: <20130722220100.A1AD62C06F@topped-with-meat.com> Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 22:01:00 -0000 X-CMAE-Score: 0 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=Ncp1iQz4 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=WkljmVdYkabdwxfqvArNOQ==:117 a=14OXPxybAAAA:8 a=htTTGrxpj_UA:10 a=Z6MIti7PxpgA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=hOe2yjtxAAAA:8 a=oDizDPLPEkcA:10 a=kKMrw-dvCea9krNF-jcA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=uaiKctzuVt8A:10 a=ZpQH4c2xWS0A:10 X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00032.txt.bz2 > Thanks for the clarification. So the two methods are functionally identical? Yes. Where you keep the value is just a matter of optimal implementation convenience for the particular machine. > >From what I understand then all that is missing on ARM from that list > is pointer mangling support? I have no new information.