From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8382 invoked by alias); 21 Sep 2012 19:12:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 8370 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Sep 2012 19:12:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,TW_CP X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 19:12:36 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1TF8eR-0002oL-IC from Maxim_Kuvyrkov@mentor.com ; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:12:35 -0700 Received: from SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.0.104]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:12:35 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 20:12:33 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optimize MIPS memcpy MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: Maxim Kuvyrkov In-Reply-To: <1348253219.6170.82.camel@ubuntu-sellcey> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 19:12:00 -0000 CC: Andrew T Pinski , "Joseph S. Myers" , Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <4B39DC41-37B2-4BD8-A840-56599701537E@codesourcery.com> References: <5044746c.23eb440a.75e2.618f@mx.google.com> <1346771341.14333.20.camel@ubuntu-sellcey> <596797ED-6575-456D-98FD-C13A209DBC49@mentor.com> <1346948701.14333.152.camel@ubuntu-sellcey> <1347376645.14333.319.camel@ubuntu-sellcey> <1348253219.6170.82.camel@ubuntu-sellcey> To: Steve Ellcey Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg00062.txt.bz2 On 22/09/2012, at 6:46 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote: > On Thu, 2012-09-20 at 21:05 +1200, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote: >=20 >> What testing was done for this patch, does it pass glibc testsuite? >=20 > Maxim, I get the same failures with this memcpy as without it when > running the glibc testsuite: Thanks Steve. I'll look into the failures that I'm seeing and try to get a= testcase for you. Also, it's possible that I flunked testing the first ti= me, we'll see. -- Maxim Kuvyrkov CodeSourcery / Mentor Graphics