From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4912 invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2010 13:23:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 4896 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Sep 2010 13:23:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from usmamail.tilera.com (HELO USMAMAIL.TILERA.COM) (72.1.168.231) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:23:23 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.109] (24.34.76.130) by USMAExch2.tad.internal.tilera.com (10.3.0.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.0.694.0; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:23:20 -0400 Message-ID: <4CA48F47.5020101@tilera.com> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:23:00 -0000 From: Chris Metcalf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: CC: Arnd Bergmann , GLIBC Devel , , Subject: Re: asm-generic/unistd.h and glibc use of NR_ipc References: <201009281040.09728.arnd@arndb.de> <4CA1E809.5010103@tilera.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-09/txt/msg00024.txt.bz2 On 9/28/2010 1:36 PM, Linas Vepstas wrote: > On 28 September 2010 08:05, Chris Metcalf wrote: >> On 9/28/2010 4:40 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> Chris Metcalf is using the generic unistd.h file on the tile architecture >>> and has a glibc port that should be easily portable to all future >>> architectures. There are a few of them getting ready to be merged >>> now (c6x, lm32, nios2, and some people have contacted me privately >>> for architectures I cannot name). >>> >> I'm happy to provide some previews of the work I'm doing to interested parties. > Yes, this is exactly what I'm looking for! I'd love to "preview" the > code; it'll take a good long while to get everything built and tested, > so feeback might take a while ... > > Any chance that these could be split out as a distinct set of patches, > taken apart from the tilera arch port, and submitted upstream > independently (to glibc and/or ports collection)? I'll help w/ patch > preparation... At this point I'm probably a week away from having something with the obvious bugs all fixed, at which point I can start submitting it back upstream. The few patches I have to common infrastructure I'll just submit to libc-alpha as git patches, then I'll probably just send a two-part patch set to libc-ports, one with the linux/generic stuff, and one with the tile-specific stuff. (It looks like changes are never made as "git pull" requests on the glibc lists, just as emailed unidiffs -- someone correct me if I'm wrong.) Linas, if you can wait a week I'd rather have you see the stuff I believe to be working 100% to get maximum use out of you as a reviewer :-) If you need it sooner, of course, I'm happy to let you have something now. -- Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp. http://www.tilera.com