From: Niels de Vos <devos@fedoraproject.org>
To: Konstantinos Margaritis <konstantinos.margaritis@linaro.org>
Cc: Dennis Gilmore <dennis@gilmore.net.au>,
libc-ports@sourceware.org,
"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>,
"Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
"cross-distro@lists.linaro.org"
<cross-distro@lists.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Use different linker path for hardfloat ABI
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:13:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F7DA7F2.1060409@fedoraproject.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120405163023.561469dca6619e31cf7a1d9e@linaro.org>
On 04/05/2012 03:30 PM, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 07:09:46 -0500
> Dennis Gilmore<dennis@gilmore.net.au> wrote:
>> Fedora does use /lib64 on x86_64 I would personally prefer /libhfp but
>> wouldn't object to /libhf though today we have f17 about to go beta
>> and all of rawhide built using /lib
>
> Hi Dennis,
>
> One potential problem that is born from the /libhf suggestion is the
> danger of having a new top level directory (/libhf) with only one
> file, the dynamic linker. AFAIU it, no distro is currently willing to
> move away from its existing scheme (/lib), Debian is most likely not
> going to, at best there could be a symlink /libhf -> /lib/<triplet>,
> but that is not solving the problem IMHO. What about other distros,
> if everyone is going to use a symlink for /libhf, then even
> suggesting it and relying on new top-level directories to solve the
> problem is the wrong approach.
>
> Loic suggested a -IMHO- better solution: to change the dynamic linker
> filename, not the dir, i.e. /lib/ld-linux-hf.so.3 (for this
> particular case).
Note that Fedora is a moving target and there already was a mentioning¹
of /lib/<triplet> for libraries earlier this year during a developers
conference². I am not sure what the current status of that proposal is,
but I think it is entirely possible that Fedora may follow the format
Debian is using.
Cheers,
Niels
¹ see page 5 from this presentation:
http://rvokal.fedorapeople.org/devconf2012/harald-A_streamlined_and_fully_compatible_Linux_Files.pdf
² http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DeveloperConference2012
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-05 14:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20120329193401.GA14860@dannf.org>
[not found] ` <4F75F2E2.3030909@arm.com>
[not found] ` <20120402210653.GC28152@dannf.org>
[not found] ` <CANLjY-nk7ML5QMBd0bKRJBA9stUOdvu1tWZqmFHxpRzObzFw1Q@mail.gmail.com>
2012-04-03 22:56 ` Joseph S. Myers
2012-04-04 2:40 ` Michael Hope
2012-04-04 9:06 ` Joseph S. Myers
2012-04-04 12:10 ` Dennis Gilmore
2012-04-05 13:30 ` Konstantinos Margaritis
2012-04-05 14:13 ` Niels de Vos [this message]
2012-04-05 15:08 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-05 15:24 ` Konstantinos Margaritis
2012-04-05 15:55 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-05 16:25 ` Konstantinos Margaritis
2012-04-10 4:10 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-05 16:16 ` Steve McIntyre
2012-04-05 17:36 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-04 23:33 ` Michael Hope
2012-04-05 0:07 ` Joseph S. Myers
2012-04-05 1:17 ` Michael Hope
2012-04-05 16:05 ` Steve McIntyre
2012-04-05 16:03 ` Steve McIntyre
2012-04-05 1:32 ` dann frazier
2012-04-05 14:57 ` Steve McIntyre
2012-04-10 20:31 ` Carlos O'Donell
[not found] <4F7AC2E1.6010000@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <4F7AD4CA.8010000@arm.com>
[not found] ` <20120403110140.GG16117@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <4F7B20D2.8060608@arm.com>
[not found] ` <4F7B227F.7060905@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <CANLjY-mDvnn8NcVQfYoUUGZD72GbH7mgYjxWOGOzLMiUwNyp2Q@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20120403231133.GI16117@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <CANLjY-=dGK05kzvHVkuo3o7p_iE1cxfTi0f+t-RMmGW+37WSEg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAHAq8pE48=eY77adiKz3PEBapXwkPn6rjr3viMoUKpJq4x-G_A@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CANLjY-k-sC86gmaTH+h-5o4_D2MOnQHB4ihhDhoPt1HbUzJp9w@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20120404065412.GJ16117@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com>
2012-04-04 9:16 ` Joseph S. Myers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F7DA7F2.1060409@fedoraproject.org \
--to=devos@fedoraproject.org \
--cc=cross-distro@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=dennis@gilmore.net.au \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=konstantinos.margaritis@linaro.org \
--cc=libc-ports@sourceware.org \
--cc=rearnsha@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).