From: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
To: Michael Hope <michael.hope@linaro.org>
Cc: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>,
"Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@systemhalted.org>,
GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
"cross-distro@lists.linaro.org"
<cross-distro@lists.linaro.org>,
"libc-ports@sourceware.org" <libc-ports@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Use different linker path for hardfloat ABI
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 22:01:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F9F0B9F.1040403@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANLjY-nhVTqr1_xrM7NpyOnyWYZkT4hpWZJb2VKDAGVvSaf8Aw@mail.gmail.com>
On 04/30/2012 03:47 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
>>>
>>> 2012-04-27 Michael Hope<michael.hope@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> * config/arm/linux-eabi.h (GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER): Pick the loader
>>> using a spec rule.
>>>
>>
>> Michael,
>>
>> can you try this patch please. It should make it possible to then
>> create linux-eabihf.h containing just
>>
>> #undef TARGET_DEFAULT_FLOAT_ABI
>> #define TARGET_DEFAULT_FLOAT_ABI ARM_FLOAT_ABI_HARD
>> #undef GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER_DEFAULT
>> #define GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER_DEFAULT GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER_HARD_FLOAT
>>
>> Which is not quite as simple as leaving out the second re-define, but
>> pretty close.
>
> Hi Richard. Your patch tests just fine. I like it. You could change
> the spec rule to the newer if-elseif-else form but that's a nit.
So who owns creating the appropriate glibc patch now that we've got a
good gcc patch?
jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-30 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-22 22:20 Michael Hope
2012-04-23 15:37 ` Richard Earnshaw
2012-04-23 21:37 ` Michael Hope
2012-04-24 13:32 ` Richard Earnshaw
2012-04-26 20:21 ` Carlos O'Donell
2012-04-26 23:27 ` Michael Hope
2012-04-30 15:24 ` Richard Earnshaw
2012-04-30 21:48 ` Michael Hope
2012-04-30 22:01 ` Jeff Law [this message]
2012-05-01 2:44 ` Michael Hope
2012-05-01 3:46 ` Jeff Law
2012-05-01 8:52 ` Richard Earnshaw
2012-05-23 7:13 ` Andreas Jaeger
2012-05-23 7:56 ` Richard Earnshaw
2012-05-23 8:01 ` Andreas Jaeger
2012-05-23 8:18 ` Richard Guenther
2012-05-23 14:15 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-05-23 21:12 ` Michael Hope
2012-05-24 4:08 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-05-24 8:15 ` Andrew Haley
2012-05-25 0:27 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-05-25 8:24 ` Andrew Haley
2012-05-24 17:08 ` Jakub Jelinek
2012-04-23 19:58 ` Carlos O'Donell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F9F0B9F.1040403@redhat.com \
--to=law@redhat.com \
--cc=carlos@systemhalted.org \
--cc=cross-distro@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=libc-ports@sourceware.org \
--cc=michael.hope@linaro.org \
--cc=rearnsha@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).