From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20969 invoked by alias); 24 May 2012 08:15:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 20939 invoked by uid 22791); 24 May 2012 08:15:14 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 May 2012 08:15:00 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4O8F0RG015004 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 24 May 2012 04:15:00 -0400 Received: from zebedee.pink (ovpn-113-22.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.22]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4O8Ew9x020109; Thu, 24 May 2012 04:14:59 -0400 Message-ID: <4FBDEE02.9000402@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 08:15:00 -0000 From: Andrew Haley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: libc-ports@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Use different linker path for hardfloat ABI References: <201205231001.17818.aj@suse.com> <201205231016.29997.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00146.txt.bz2 On 05/23/2012 10:11 PM, Michael Hope wrote: > My concern is that a point release of GCC would stop working against > the latest release of GLIBC. Can't we put the compatibility symlink into the official glibc codebase? Andrew.