From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22014 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2013 18:11:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 22002 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Feb 2013 18:11:27 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-vc0-f181.google.com (HELO mail-vc0-f181.google.com) (209.85.220.181) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 18:11:22 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id f13so574190vcb.40 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:11:22 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.52.89.52 with SMTP id bl20mr1074542vdb.85.1361988681984; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:11:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from anchor.twiddle.net (50-194-63-110-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [50.194.63.110]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q5sm1249271vdj.5.2013.02.27.10.11.20 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:11:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <512E4C45.30102@twiddle.net> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 18:11:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130219 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Joseph S. Myers" CC: libc-ports@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/26] arm: Update preconfigure fragment for gcc 4.8 References: <1361934986-17018-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> <1361934986-17018-3-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00113.txt.bz2 On 02/27/2013 09:54 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Tue, 26 Feb 2013, Richard Henderson wrote: > >> - grep __ARM_ARCH | >> + grep '__ARM_ARCH_.*__' | > > I think this should be restricted more closely to those likely to be > relevant, using [0-9] before the .* - OK with that change (presuming it > works). Just this particular change would be reasonable to cherry-pick to > 2.17 branch as well for the benefit of anyone using that release branch > with 4.8. > Yes, this [0-9] change works. I'll commit that separately. r~