From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23037 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2013 15:52:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 23026 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Mar 2013 15:52:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ve0-f179.google.com (HELO mail-ve0-f179.google.com) (209.85.128.179) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 15:52:08 +0000 Received: by mail-ve0-f179.google.com with SMTP id da11so6958265veb.10 for ; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 07:52:08 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.52.21.8 with SMTP id r8mr5114834vde.130.1362585127940; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 07:52:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from anchor.twiddle.net (50-194-63-110-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [50.194.63.110]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dh7sm6297921vdb.0.2013.03.06.07.52.05 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Mar 2013 07:52:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <51376622.6060805@twiddle.net> Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 15:52:00 -0000 From: Richard Henderson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130219 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Joseph S. Myers" CC: libc-ports@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/14] arm: Add optimized ffs for armv6t2 References: <1362159320-5934-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> <1362159320-5934-12-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00055.txt.bz2 On 03/04/2013 06:08 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Richard Henderson wrote: > >> * sysdeps/arm/armv6t2/ffs.S: New file. >> * sysdeps/arm/armv6t2/ffsll.S: New file. > > OK, if ffsll has been tested for both big and little endian (or OK for > just ffs pending big-endian ffsll testing). > I did finally get big-endian testing done. There appear to be no big-endian distributions extant anymore, so this required doing the entire bootstrap gcc/glibc dance from scratch. It had been long enough since I'd done so that it took me a while to remember the steps. So I've committed this entire patch set, including ffsll, and will shortly be re-submitting the string routines previously posted. r~