From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8837 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2013 18:55:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 8825 invoked by uid 89); 15 Jun 2013 18:55:33 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from usmamail.tilera.com (HELO USMAMAIL.TILERA.COM) (12.216.194.151) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 18:55:32 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.101] (98.217.155.22) by USMAExch2.tad.internal.tilera.com (10.3.0.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.0.722.0; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 14:55:29 -0400 Message-ID: <51BCB8A1.2000707@tilera.com> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 18:55:00 -0000 From: Chris Metcalf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Joseph S. Myers" CC: , David Miller , Carlos O'Donell , Subject: Re: [PATCH] tile: default to little-endian in bits/endian.h References: <201306122057.r5CKvRl0008808@farm-0002.internal.tilera.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-06/txt/msg00021.txt.bz2 On 6/15/2013 1:21 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > Is there a reason this went on 2.15 and 2.16 branches but not 2.17? We > don't have a specific policy about keeping the fixes on each branch a > superset of those on the previous one, but I'd think doing so is generally > a good idea.... I'm waiting for David's ack as 2.17 maintainer. I got Carlos's for 2.15 (and thus I figured, implicitly 2.16). It seems pretty uncontroversial, but perhaps I should have held off until I had all the maintainers' acks? -- Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp. http://www.tilera.com