With the following patch, I get

> testing long double (without inline functions)
> Failure: fma (0x1.fffffffffffffffffffffffffffcp-16382, 0x1.0000000000000000000000000001p-1, 0x1p-16494): Exception "Underflow" set
> Failure: fma (-0x1.fffffffffffffffffffffffffffcp-16382, 0x1.0000000000000000000000000001p-1, -0x1p-16494): Exception "Underflow" set
> Failure: fma (0x1p-16494, -0x1p-16494, 0x1p-16382): Exception "Underflow" set
> Failure: fma (0x1p-16494, 0x1p-16494, -0x1p-16382): Exception "Underflow" set
> Failure: fma_downward (-0x1.fffffffffffffffffffffffffffcp-16382, 0x1.0000000000000000000000000001p-1, -0x1p-16494): Exception "Underflow" set
> Failure: fma_downward (-0x1p-16494, 0x1.1p-1, -0x0.ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffp-16382): Exception "Underflow" set
> Failure: fma_downward (0x1p-16494, 0x1p-16494, -0x1p-16382): Exception "Underflow" set
> Failure: fma_upward (0x1.fffffffffffffffffffffffffffcp-16382, 0x1.0000000000000000000000000001p-1, 0x1p-16494): Exception "Underflow" set
> Failure: fma_upward (0x1p-16494, 0x1.1p-1, 0x0.ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffp-16382): Exception "Underflow" set
> Failure: fma_upward (0x1p-16494, -0x1p-16494, 0x1p-16382): Exception "Underflow" set

but I thought you'd already committed the patch to solve this
as commit 695c378f81263640618bdebf56eaa065f578251f ?


r~