public inbox for
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Carlos O'Donell" <>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <>
Cc: "" <>,
	       Kyle McMartin <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: Fix R_ARM_IRELATIVE for REL relocs.
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 04:17:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On 08/28/2013 12:14 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2013, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> 2013-08-28  Kyle McMartin  <>
>> 	    Carlos O'Donell  <>
>> 	* sysdeps/arm/dl-machine [!RTLD_BOOTSTRAP] (elf_machine_rel):
>> 	Pass GLRO(dl_hwcap) to the IFUNC resolver.
> OK, given a bug filed in Bugzilla and a corresponding [BZ #N] notation and 
> entry in NEWS for the fixed bug.  

I created BZ# 15905.

Sorry for forgetting, and thanks for reminding me.

I've checked in the patch which fixes the failures we're
seeing in Fedora on this hardware.

> Have you verified that all ARM instances 
> of such code now consistently pass the HWCAP value?


There are 4 places that require dl_hwcap to be used:
* ifunc-impl-list.c (__libc_ifunc_impl_list) - Already uses dl_hwcap.

* dl-irel.h (elf_ifunc_invoke) - Already uses dl_hwcap. Was fixed by
  Richard Henderson in commit 73da6bacf (along with other instances
  in dl-machine.h).

* dl-machine.h (elf_machine_rel) - Fixed by this patch.

* dl-machine.h (elf_machine_rela) - Fixed by Will Newton's patch.

These are the only place that I know about that require using
dl_hwcap and all of them are now fixed.

The uses are inconsistent in their use of `unsigned long int'
vs. 'int' for the dl_hwcap parameter, but changing that could
be a future cleanup.

I will note that the 32-bit ARM testsuite on this hardware is
not clean e.g.
make[2]: *** [/home/codonell/build/math/test-fenv.out] Error 1
make[1]: *** [math/tests] Error 2
make[2]: *** [/home/codonell/build/stdio-common/bug22.out] Error 1
make[1]: *** [stdio-common/tests] Error 2
make[2]: [/home/codonell/build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored)
make[2]: *** [/home/codonell/build/nptl/tst-cleanup2.out] Error 1
make[2]: *** [/home/codonell/build/nptl/tst-cleanupx2.out] Error 1
make[1]: *** [nptl/tests] Error 2
make[2]: [/home/codonell/build/conform/run-conformtest.out] Error 1 (ignored)
make[2]: *** [/home/codonell/build/elf/ifuncmain5picstatic.out] Error 139
make[1]: *** [elf/tests] Error 2
make[1]: *** [/home/codonell/build/check-local-headers.out] Error 1
make: *** [check] Error 2

In particular ifuncmain5picstatic.out looks troublesome, and
I need to look at it to see if something is further wrong with
the IFUNC support.


  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-29  4:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-28  4:23 Carlos O'Donell
2013-08-28 16:14 ` Joseph S. Myers
2013-08-29  4:17   ` Carlos O'Donell [this message]
2013-08-29 10:00     ` Will Newton
2013-08-29 12:25       ` Joseph S. Myers
2013-08-29 19:18         ` Will Newton
2013-08-29 12:24     ` Joseph S. Myers
2013-08-29 19:27     ` Joseph S. Myers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).