From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9595 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2013 16:03:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 9573 invoked by uid 89); 3 Sep 2013 16:03:21 -0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 16:03:21 +0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r83G3H3M013130 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 3 Sep 2013 12:03:17 -0400 Received: from [10.3.113.109] (ovpn-113-109.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.109]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r83G3FPm006556; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 12:03:16 -0400 Message-ID: <52260843.9010704@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 16:03:00 -0000 From: "Carlos O'Donell" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130805 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roland McGrath CC: "Joseph S. Myers" , Mike Frysinger , libc-ports@sourceware.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hppa: add fanotify_mark References: <1377100993-9438-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <1377728809-6729-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <5220DB3E.1040609@redhat.com> <20130830205130.CC81A2C06E@topped-with-meat.com> In-Reply-To: <20130830205130.CC81A2C06E@topped-with-meat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg00017.txt.bz2 On 08/30/2013 04:51 PM, Roland McGrath wrote: > It just seems fundamentally wrong to backport a new symbol. It's nice to say that it's wrong, but what are the alternatives? Upgrading the distribution to 2.19 carries with it significant risks. Cheers, Carlos.