From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20950 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2013 04:34:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 19403 invoked by uid 89); 14 Nov 2013 04:34:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from Unknown (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 04:34:25 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1Vgod8-0003E3-0t from ChungLin_Tang@mentor.com ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 20:34:10 -0800 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-02.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.96.206]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 13 Nov 2013 20:34:09 -0800 Received: from air.local (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-02.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.96.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.247.3; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 20:34:08 -0800 Message-ID: <528452BE.6020904@codesourcery.com> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 04:34:00 -0000 From: Chung-Lin Tang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Joseph S. Myers" CC: Chris Metcalf , "libc-ports@sourceware.org" , Andrew Pinski Subject: Re: struct statfs/statfs64 in linux-generic References: <52774A2F.5010505@codesourcery.com> <527BF01B.9080704@tilera.com> <527F42AF.8060204@codesourcery.com> <5283357D.2050205@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2 On 13/11/13 8:58 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: > >> (struct statfs): Use __alignof__(__u64) in alignment attribute >> instead of 8. >> (struct statfs64): Likewise. > > I don't like the use of __u64 here - that's a kernel type, not a glibc > one, and glibc headers shouldn't be using it. > Sure, how about __U64_TYPE? This seems in line with using __SWORD_TYPE from Thanks, Chung-Lin