From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28592 invoked by alias); 14 Jun 2012 06:54:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 28570 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jun 2012 06:54:58 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_PGP_SIGNED,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 06:54:46 +0000 Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=EU1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1Sf3x6-0001qS-8P from Thomas_Schwinge@mentor.com ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:54:44 -0700 Received: from feldtkeller.schwinge.homeip.net ([172.30.72.25]) by EU1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:54:42 +0100 From: Thomas Schwinge To: Roland McGrath , Carlos O'Donell Cc: libc-ports@sourceware.org, libc-alpha Subject: Re: Request for help: Fix building tarballs for ports add-on. In-Reply-To: <20120614002303.57D642C08B@topped-with-meat.com> References: <4FD92B99.3050605@mentor.com> <20120614002303.57D642C08B@topped-with-meat.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.9-101-g81dad07 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 06:54:00 -0000 Message-ID: <87zk865qon.fsf@schwinge.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00032.txt.bz2 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 667 Hi! On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:23:03 -0700 (PDT), Roland McGrath wrote: > I've been thinking that right after 2.16 will be a good time to consolida= te > the repositories (just the initial step, making it ports/ under the libc > tree). I agree (and will implement as discussed unless someone else suggests a different way). > So there might not be very many more iterations of doing this, > though I guess 2.16.x could easily have a substantial upper bound for x. > That said, automation ought to be well nigh trivial. Unless I've forgott= en > about something, we're just doing git archive | compressor-of-choice. Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Thomas --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-length: 489 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJP2YqoAAoJENuKOtuXzphJVaMH/1l8IA4bU7M1q825a2HsIUvm dWf7js0rVnAI1TMwZVWY7Sj5p0vw/C2BXdP66VIGEErB880APRFDJaZeLLfKyvw8 xjr0r1KY2PPiSj64PZ7fk5I6CKQZNtIwLmYtqDdmklp2ogBEIyKhihmEhO2lsJ7t J+wBXKj0OCq6K0k3Zs9JLxzbmKPPMxU372Auf93LCgIN9EuMDy4r/WR+bEj30fnn tnrjO7lUDm0fuQAijpRHlqyB4Tgn6e3xjCrGAI23y1GbpKrKB/C2rPMCu2yRJDP4 +BGQePSpxzqktdNKcYNf2n2CWNhREqyjgw0bCxcgouMa+uAui8i5x7O0tTv/gOs= =uVo8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--