From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 91698 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2017 18:51:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 91680 invoked by uid 89); 23 Jan 2017 18:51:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=rolling, sk:libcpo, libc-ports@sourceware.org, libcportssourcewareorg X-HELO: mail-qt0-f170.google.com Received: from mail-qt0-f170.google.com (HELO mail-qt0-f170.google.com) (209.85.216.170) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 18:50:51 +0000 Received: by mail-qt0-f170.google.com with SMTP id v23so139676429qtb.0 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:50:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=YN8q4KuxcIG5MqEyo8RgFO+Rpu0/LKfPQI1i/cpCtdg=; b=Y+XWZTT7XR5uYyBhOkl8c5SMgSf2Vo27a5jknalSk8dMsgztmz+aAw35XiBifryG3b Qpnb4LgCS0S8fGWu/FnZBLFX/sUUNp7ykpvKZ6KH9v5pCnqDEQrQn1lOHn0hwG7BfUId ig+HpwPVEoltI/gMLyY0n8zXROLGxptFjkI3uytMBCvprgqBZtkGZ2RsMV5othTuLQ9b VHdoIBB70MIAhJOpnMAL6tDxunfcvu2JWDUl8QIociTCSMeP2JuDaGz+oKpUBLTJv4VO hF9O3FnA3kysRd1EgiWWS3b5dYmbQkzQgSQhpOAnXZ85AHC0IlXu0QL+2mn6Sd1aA37j MomQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJJZlwOdfUa34wor+g/KYxb7fvXViVwKqc32hepzcSfPSyqjxDmdSLm4GnFRcSf3j0h X-Received: by 10.200.49.45 with SMTP id g42mr27607394qtb.9.1485197449275; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:50:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.40] (otwaon234vw-lp140-05-70-31-29-135.dsl.bell.ca. [70.31.29.135]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c41sm13885649qtd.3.2017.01.23.10.50.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Jan 2017 10:50:48 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Glibc 2.3.90 Where can I find source? To: Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho , j serralheiro , libc-ports@sourceware.org References: <441720578.1199074.1485079270423.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <441720578.1199074.1485079270423@mail.yahoo.com> <87d1fdj3z4.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> From: Carlos O'Donell Message-ID: <9b5cddd7-5f6e-ce13-f482-abc6c87a1438@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 18:51:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87d1fdj3z4.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-01/txt/msg00002.txt.bz2 On 01/23/2017 08:33 AM, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote: > j serralheiro via libc-ports writes: > >> The glibc library installed by distribution familiar is glib 2.3.90. >> The kernel is 2.6.16 >> >> Up until now I compiled a cross-compiler and compiled a @hello@ program. I linked this program statically with glib 2.10 that I also compiled. >> In this case the kernel headers are from 2.6.21 that I downloaded from github or something, a merge of handhelds and hackndev. >> I searched and I cannot find source for glibc2.3.90 source code. > > As far as I know, glibc never had an official 2.3.90 release. This version > seems to come from a Linux distribution. > > Fedora uses the same version scheme, e.g.: > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/glibc.git/tag/?h=glibc-2_3_90-39 Right. And even then Fedora just follows upstream glibc's version for Rawhide (rolling release). There is no such thing as a 2.3.90 release, the ".90" denotes that the sources came from the development branch _after_ glibc 2.3 was released. So a version of 2.3.90 means that the sources where somewhere between 2.3 and 2.4 (before release). -- Cheers, Carlos.