From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-ports-return-1885-listarch-libc-ports=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 2211 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2011 02:28:16 -0000
Received: (qmail 2203 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Mar 2011 02:28:16 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-bw0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-bw0-f41.google.com) (209.85.214.41)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 02:28:11 +0000
Received: by mail-bw0-f41.google.com with SMTP id 17so2940015bwz.0        for <libc-ports@sourceware.org>; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 18:28:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.20.69 with SMTP id e5mr1168517bkb.146.1299292090866; Fri, 04 Mar 2011 18:28:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.99.138 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 18:28:10 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <E1PvFcz-0001WA-VY@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1PvFcz-0001WA-VY@fencepost.gnu.org>
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 02:28:00 -0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTinESenCESc8_tHCTMYi0khk6+kTcEpYsWhn=dqi@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: tarball?
From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@systemhalted.org>
To: ams@gnu.org
Cc: libc-ports@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-ports.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-ports-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-ports@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-ports-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00011.txt.bz2

On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Alfred M. Szmidt <ams@gnu.org> wrote:
> Does anyone object to me rolling a glibc-ports tarball?

Not at all. It was on my todo list, but it's pretty low on the priority list :-(

Cheers,
Carlos.