From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-ports-return-4172-listarch-libc-ports=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 27672 invoked by alias); 21 May 2013 08:25:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-ports.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-ports-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-ports@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-ports-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faqs>
Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 27662 invoked by uid 89); 21 May 2013 08:25:31 -0000
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,TW_GJ,TW_TJ autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received: from mail-pd0-f170.google.com (HELO mail-pd0-f170.google.com) (209.85.192.170)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 May 2013 08:25:30 +0000
Received: by mail-pd0-f170.google.com with SMTP id x10so266626pdj.29        for <libc-ports@sourceware.org>; Tue, 21 May 2013 01:25:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=google.com; s=20120113;        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to         :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state;        bh=UY1Sia2aGx+mJEL4RS+x3S3feiryvbexBpvkoHTmp/E=;        b=U/J/24FOa+ylba0clPNNwjbv3rWJhG1W2e0PcLIkENkABWWlPCbC9tSSSrmuhcdzeT         8hWX1aGwGm04eoy0UIzLGDlu5dZ31bMTL2Rm5KNE034YeyF5TAyL8F8w29OuoVwwWH5R         tPcxcyod0attlbtLJ3486Btuf4sZcs0ntGhIqsRWZ6OfLiPTx2h3vK3RY8lvkJPEwOeP         LSNuBHnUMtwMNRw29g0Vx2dPADZcluVWCmIIZ8b6ZmuicM2P0EH3u5D1wc8h9hYBEISE         +yAYg1KIe1meC3epMFJ4ok1ZJH28LtSims4bWl2svMeahrr/fNt+Sq6qfDtnonmOG6zR         blNQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.255.99 with SMTP id ap3mr2064144pad.102.1369124729482; Tue, 21 May 2013 01:25:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.23.165 with HTTP; Tue, 21 May 2013 01:25:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <mvmsj1gpxlg.fsf@hawking.suse.de>
References: <mvmsj1gpxlg.fsf@hawking.suse.de>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 08:25:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CABXK9ncxFGid8z2ZVWCQxAqZEZqzuuyAwqfvh_OkrOfZ6aScBw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] AArch64: Don't clobber argument for tail call to __sigjmp_save in sigsetjmp
From: Marcus Shawcroft <marcus.shawcroft@linaro.org>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: libc-ports@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlWRaaHQfEUE4cD/1/uzZTgu6BidVyX3/+7Bx0wNQ+vES0ZiXgMoEtA+QPCVgp1QEXfx4rF
X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg00092.txt.bz2

On 21 May 2013 09:04, Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> wrote:
> sigsetjmp needs to preserve the second argument for the tail call to
> __sigjmp_save.  Also, in ld.so there is no need to call it at all.
>
> Andreas.
>
>         [BZ #15493]
>         * setjmp/Makefile (tests): Add tst-sigsetjmp.
>         * setjmp/tst-sigsetjmp.c: New test.
>
> ChangeLog.aarch64:
>         [BZ #15493]
>         * sysdeps/aarch64/setjmp.S (__sigsetjmp): Don't clobber register

Looks good to me.
/Marcus