From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28636 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2013 21:57:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 28628 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Feb 2013 21:57:52 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ob0-f177.google.com (HELO mail-ob0-f177.google.com) (209.85.214.177) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 21:57:46 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f177.google.com with SMTP id wc18so593008obb.22 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 13:57:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=+Z0ThW5r8IU9f3W+wr34a926+rFCHqMwGoTiF7Dfyeo=; b=IMKG4B++ETG4KqjtnRZqOeQAlTLg6bN3VwHgg2DqAKohFYpgktum0HTu2eIbmIkVSG qwW78RFaJmV6WDd64BKmmpt5Hc849Xjo6ExpWBxVZ0GRVN5hq+jcRZe0yorbFsAiso0S bGU2l161J0CNLkkB86OxXzwKcpBzGhkMxaMNcqVhYgAfrOKyWwn9rp7lnCOXH7pS8UfE Qq4SvQSb8NCqU59XY2o1/XMG3WJJnncIOV0deSR4ekbQ3t20ryAExwntEGoBxe5GLIDt 65AdZ9Xt2QFVUn04HCE4LI4+dJzIB3QZrjsf759hB215jCaoE9dwOPFmh/NKFg0XWkpc Q/Xg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.217.10 with SMTP id ou10mr14708781obc.30.1360706265749; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 13:57:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.93.37 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 13:57:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20130209.014909.573423212502453699.davem@davemloft.net> <5116636F.1040003@redhat.com> <20130209.235603.1409377113964639273.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 21:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoid unnecessary busy loop in __lll_timedlock_wait on ARM. From: "Carlos O'Donell" To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: David Miller , carlos@redhat.com, "Joseph S. Myers" , schwab@linux-m68k.org, thomas_schwinge@mentor.com, kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp, marcus.shawcroft@linaro.org, katsuki.uwatoko@toshiba.co.jp, libc-ports@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQntrwPMz8/1ojxM/rMpGCStRBdl1kXQPS7GiTcUBYcEZS7yGUJKj8f6QP4t1sayVVBeisEZ X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00029.txt.bz2 On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > It's been too long, sorry. It may have been necessary solely to > provide the separate EABI and NPTL versions in sysdeps; you'd have to > look at e.g. the sysdeps selection order for the LinuxThreads version. > It may also be related to the lack of usable atomic primitives, > pre-EABI. Thanks! I knew it was a long shot, but sometimes people remember the oddest things for the longest time :-) Cheers, Carlos.