From: "Paulo César Pereira de Andrade" <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@gmail.com>
To: Michael Hope <michael.hope@linaro.org>
Cc: Steve McIntyre <steve.mcintyre@linaro.org>,
cross-distro@lists.linaro.org, Adam Conrad <adconrad@debian.org>,
linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>,
libc-ports@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Phone call (was Re: Armhf dynamic linker path)
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 01:15:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHAq8pEA+M12HCm2HbhXZngrNF0wD0rqw33ZucgqUf=-UTcPHQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANLjY-nN2=ZUFu5EV_FaymF8nJ18AVr0UoHJH4wOztU0sd9Qtg@mail.gmail.com>
Em 11 de abril de 2012 21:16, Michael Hope <michael.hope@linaro.org> escreveu:
> 2012/4/12 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
> <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@gmail.com>:
>> Em 11 de abril de 2012 20:22, Michael Hope <michael.hope@linaro.org> escreveu:
>>> On 12 April 2012 10:38, Steve McIntyre <steve.mcintyre@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 02:06:09AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>And here's the details as promised.
>>>>>
>>>>>I've started a wiki page at
>>>>>
>>>>>https://wiki.linaro.org/OfficeofCTO/HardFloat/LinkerPathCallApr2012
>>>>>
>>>>>with a strawman agenda for now, and a Doodle poll at
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.doodle.com/93bitkqeb7auyxn7
>>>>>
>>>>>to see when the best time is for the call on Thursday/Friday. Please
>>>>>fill in the times that work for you ASAP and I'll announce the result
>>>>>during Wednesday. Ideally we'd like stakeholders from all the relevant
>>>>>distros and the upstream toolchain developers to be there, able to
>>>>>represent their groups and (importantly) able to make a decision here
>>>>>on what we should do.
>>>>>
>>>>>Apologies for the short notice, but we need a decision quickly.
>>>>
>>>> And the best time turns out to be Friday at 15:00 UTC (16:00 BST,
>>>> 11:00 EDT etc.). Of the 10 people who responded in the poll, the only
>>>> person who can't make that time is Michael in .nz. Sorry, Michael.
>>>
>>> All good. My vote is for /lib/ld-arm-linux-gnueabihf.so.3 as it:
>>> * is similar to /lib/ld-x86-64.so.2
>>> * keeps the libraries and loader in the same directory
>>> * doesn't invent a new /libhf directory
>>> * is easier to implement in GLIBC
>>> * is architecture and ABI unique
>>> * requires less change for distros where the hard float libraries are
>>> already in /lib
>>
>> Sorry for more bikeshedding, but afaik rpm based distros are
>> using the armv7hl identifier, so it could as well be
>>
>> /lib/ld-linux-armv7hl.so.3
>
> This includes the ABI (h), adds the endianess (l), and implies a
> architecture level (v7). The name for the most common configurations
> should be as short as possible so I'd rather drop the 'l' and add a
> 'b' or 'eb' if anyone wants a big endian distro in the future. The
> architecture level is a problem as the loader should also be valid on
> ARMv5 and ARMv6 hard float builds. Skype should be able to make a
> hard float binary that runs on everything, including a potential ARMv6
> hard float RaspberryPi build.
This means ld.so (and what else? a skype binary should not come fully
statically linked) should be built with -march=armv5te? That is, common
denominator should be vfpv3-d16, ldrd/strd and thumb2 instruction set?
AFAIK, for "user level", armv6 with vfp is effectively amv7 (sans armv7-r
that has a div instruction in thumb mode).
>> Other variant could be
>>
>> /armv7hl-linux/lib/ld.so.3
>
> This introduces both a new directory and a new style for naming :)
Well, I said I was sorry for more bikeshedding :-)
> -- Michael
Paulo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-12 1:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20120331103406.GA17776@einval.com>
[not found] ` <201204100019.13472.vapier@gentoo.org>
[not found] ` <4F83B5AD.3010302@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <201204100033.08853.vapier@gentoo.org>
[not found] ` <4F83B939.10205@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <4F84AC96.6020500@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20120411010608.GC25263@einval.com>
[not found] ` <20120411223755.GD25263@einval.com>
2012-04-11 23:22 ` Michael Hope
[not found] ` <CAHAq8pGbEtmu=QuOFGJpPCck6fFmb63Zm+Ax5B9Bg-m3U1UQ_w@mail.gmail.com>
2012-04-12 0:16 ` Michael Hope
2012-04-12 1:15 ` Paulo César Pereira de Andrade [this message]
2012-04-12 1:40 ` Michael Hope
2012-04-12 2:15 ` Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
[not found] ` <20120412003801.GS26898@dream.aleph1.co.uk>
2012-04-12 1:27 ` Michael Hope
2012-04-12 6:06 ` Jakub Jelinek
[not found] ` <CAAqcGHmJL4jiL8u3MMqw_B38m1HHbVGdZouiEqJV3o_JkLPf5g@mail.gmail.com>
2012-04-12 7:48 ` Jakub Jelinek
2012-04-12 17:48 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-12 17:53 ` Jakub Jelinek
2012-04-12 18:14 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-12 17:46 ` Mike Frysinger
2012-04-12 20:33 ` Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHAq8pEA+M12HCm2HbhXZngrNF0wD0rqw33ZucgqUf=-UTcPHQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade@gmail.com \
--cc=adconrad@debian.org \
--cc=cross-distro@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=law@redhat.com \
--cc=libc-ports@sourceware.org \
--cc=linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=michael.hope@linaro.org \
--cc=steve.mcintyre@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).