Re: RFA: Port maintainers: Convert WORDSIZE[32|64]/ld to abi-variants

["H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>]

On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Andreas Krebbel
<krebbel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 05/30/2012 02:29 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Joseph S. Myers
>> <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 26 May 2012, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>
>>>> I restored sh and sparc entries in shlib-versions on hjl/abi branch.
>>>> The new patch is at
>>>>
>>>> http://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=patch;h=0d1f492b3cf83a200601c1f49734b048c5547e57
>>>
>>> Provided the new version passes architecture maintainer testing I think it
>>> will probably be OK for 2.16, given the comments Roland requested saying
>>> that the use of soname variables set in makefiles is wrong and a bug filed
>>> with a 2.17 milestone to get this cleaned up properly along the lines I
>>> proposed (naming ABI variants, not triplets, in shlib-versions, with all
>>> the architecture information in shlib-versions moving to appropriate
>>> sysdeps directories shared by all the ABI variants of each architecture).
>>>
>>
>> I rebased hjl/abi branch.  Has anyone verified it on sparc, powerpc an s390x?
>
> I've tested your patch on s390 and s390x. No regressions.
>
> Bye,
>
> -Andreas-
>

Adhemerval,

Can you test hjl/abi branch on powerpc?

Thanks.


-- 
H.J.