From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25388 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2012 23:22:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 25368 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Apr 2012 23:22:47 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f171.google.com) (209.85.212.171) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 23:22:34 +0000 Received: by wibhj13 with SMTP id hj13so3770147wib.12 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:22:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=1QRCE7lvm96EVDPKwXvIENp//6c2hcgTpCE7bKu+CDU=; b=NGKMY3YwFMcZCQfdaAY7a0QWBxbh/BTF2sThSomT/vRnQugR/CmkLF2xDNWpLUFTES 4u3Ro1avK+TARW8KNbWiCeevImxaPBixSPWFhC4B5/BblEOVgscO9OWAQ3J6LTc0jKJq YF1FcqUIkI6WmampvGYlS6KX5ogoc6SV1okLVWZ/mO3Kqd1dBqE/6N1XKIjuLyUSCF6L hNaeMftQgwA1n78CNTa/Fy8jMDhOqaP38pLPhZXyADJCKHb7DWyhx8pQGXY3PDmeH3hj XvkJSKqE7Mf0KnycPA/j9fHfdYHvUVGt5KLRxASFpL9DyNYLAtDio98xokyJOHBogV61 nDTg== Received: by 10.180.24.7 with SMTP id q7mr10561242wif.11.1334186553535; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:22:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.194.165 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:22:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120411223755.GD25263@einval.com> References: <20120331103406.GA17776@einval.com> <201204100019.13472.vapier@gentoo.org> <4F83B5AD.3010302@redhat.com> <201204100033.08853.vapier@gentoo.org> <4F83B939.10205@redhat.com> <4F84AC96.6020500@redhat.com> <20120411010608.GC25263@einval.com> <20120411223755.GD25263@einval.com> From: Michael Hope Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 23:22:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Phone call (was Re: Armhf dynamic linker path) To: Steve McIntyre Cc: cross-distro@lists.linaro.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Adam Conrad , libc-ports@sourceware.org, linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org, Jeff Law Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlF/Ra7dd5/oTI1jJYZmyXddV0UZh8We7v48uDz0kRwEiwAnwMkezK79rzfkRLQSBjbAKhh X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2 On 12 April 2012 10:38, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 02:06:09AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> >>And here's the details as promised. >> >>I've started a wiki page at >> >>https://wiki.linaro.org/OfficeofCTO/HardFloat/LinkerPathCallApr2012 >> >>with a strawman agenda for now, and a Doodle poll at >> >>http://www.doodle.com/93bitkqeb7auyxn7 >> >>to see when the best time is for the call on Thursday/Friday. Please >>fill in the times that work for you ASAP and I'll announce the result >>during Wednesday. Ideally we'd like stakeholders from all the relevant >>distros and the upstream toolchain developers to be there, able to >>represent their groups and (importantly) able to make a decision here >>on what we should do. >> >>Apologies for the short notice, but we need a decision quickly. > > And the best time turns out to be Friday at 15:00 UTC (16:00 BST, > 11:00 EDT etc.). Of the 10 people who responded in the poll, the only > person who can't make that time is Michael in .nz. Sorry, Michael. All good. My vote is for /lib/ld-arm-linux-gnueabihf.so.3 as it: * is similar to /lib/ld-x86-64.so.2 * keeps the libraries and loader in the same directory * doesn't invent a new /libhf directory * is easier to implement in GLIBC * is architecture and ABI unique * requires less change for distros where the hard float libraries are already in /lib I'm happy to do the GLIBC and GCC implementation. -- Michael