From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7129 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2012 01:27:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 7112 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Apr 2012 01:27:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f177.google.com) (209.85.212.177) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 01:27:31 +0000 Received: by wibhj13 with SMTP id hj13so1183938wib.12 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:27:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=kaYQ1n8dfIvC0YrLUWh25R9LAVEQS5ayUjtCSwo1OW4=; b=pJp43VFmbGpt9lUnHO1ldX2uKgflNUce3wqG7ccq2kIS5wRhHOoL3MDCA22tR+9X9F VM37PHR+omTlKb16hsVsbERrjqdgwFqASvaChybvqLGL3utDFlj2glzMoSmLjrF1yvfK pc02vL1BufqWetxRBOkw8KsnT80qv7Z+zKfK1886tUu4W4gYZcsJs/ohKarL65lPKIpr F9jZ3d/N4x61plUQyC6QMio9dDmaJV5L237zlrrzzUZtpCVZQg9k8xwcQZKhHKdldYw7 ysRVuXjpWISGBTrJM54yKeGaYR2DoJQ2r1t99paRP7TzStVFcGRi9N4LXyK5wlNpwpjt AaTA== Received: by 10.180.83.198 with SMTP id s6mr1305102wiy.8.1334194050100; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:27:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.194.165 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:27:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120412003801.GS26898@dream.aleph1.co.uk> References: <201204100019.13472.vapier@gentoo.org> <4F83B5AD.3010302@redhat.com> <201204100033.08853.vapier@gentoo.org> <4F83B939.10205@redhat.com> <4F84AC96.6020500@redhat.com> <20120411010608.GC25263@einval.com> <20120411223755.GD25263@einval.com> <20120412003801.GS26898@dream.aleph1.co.uk> From: Michael Hope Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 01:27:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Phone call (was Re: Armhf dynamic linker path) To: Wookey Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Paulo_C=E9sar_Pereira_de_Andrade?= , cross-distro@lists.linaro.org, Adam Conrad , linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org, Jeff Law , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, libc-ports@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkT/qGOQrTVXCNfqCvJ8lC2pu9l9FiMytUnDbnIpbhcp/f053PgMI6gGZPLUfm1UYmrOC6L X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00028.txt.bz2 On 12 April 2012 12:38, Wookey wrote: > +++ Michael Hope [2012-04-12 12:16 +1200]: >> 2012/4/12 Paulo C=E9sar Pereira de Andrade >> : > >> >> All good. =A0My vote is for /lib/ld-arm-linux-gnueabihf.so.3 as it: >> > =A0Sorry for more bikeshedding, >> > /lib/ld-linux-armv7hl.so.3 >> =A0I'd rather drop the 'l' > > We've already had the GNU triplet-name argument for this ABI. I don't > think having it again in order to use something slightly different for > the linker name is very helpful. > > Unless of course we find that was another chimera and in fact that's > not really agreed either... Sorry, I should have said that in my reply. I agree, the GNU triplet should be used. I couldn't resist going into the past-covered reasons why. -- Michael