From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27606 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2011 19:06:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 27597 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Mar 2011 19:06:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (140.186.70.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 Mar 2011 19:06:28 +0000 Received: from ams by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PwJHe-0006jv-PQ; Sun, 06 Mar 2011 14:06:26 -0500 Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2011 19:06:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: ams@gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) To: "Carlos O'Donell" CC: libc-ports@sourceware.org In-reply-to: (carlos@systemhalted.org) Subject: Re: tarball? Reply-to: ams@gnu.org References: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00014.txt.bz2 > Does anyone object to me rolling a glibc-ports tarball? Not at all. It was on my todo list, but it's pretty low on the priority list :-( Then I'll do it today then.