From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12285 invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2011 13:56:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 12218 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Mar 2011 13:56:18 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (38.113.113.100) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:56:12 +0000 Received: (qmail 9461 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2011 13:56:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digraph.polyomino.org.uk) (joseph@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 23 Mar 2011 13:56:10 -0000 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2OXg-0007Nt-Kb; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:56:08 +0000 Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:56:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: Ulrich Weigand cc: libc-ports@sourceware.org, patches@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][arm] Create ARM unwind records for system call stubs In-Reply-To: <201103231349.p2NDnOQS003216@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <201103231349.p2NDnOQS003216@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-03/txt/msg00044.txt.bz2 On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > > > > > I've tested this by running the glibc testsuite on armv7l-linux-gnueabi > > > > Incidentally, does this mean you have a local config.sub patch for this > > target? Because neither the current version in config.git, nor the rather > > older version in libc, accepts this target. > > > > $ ./config.sub armv7l-linux-gnueabi > > Invalid configuration `armv7l-linux-gnueabi': machine `armv7l' not recognized > > No, I just misspelled the triple in the email; the actual triple I used was: > armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabi > > (I would have thought the "unknown" can be omitted, but apparently not.) That it can't be omitted would be a bug in config.sub (that in one place it accepts arm | arm[bl]e | arme[lb] | armv[2345] | armv[345][lb], in another arm-* | armbe-* | armle-* | armeb-* | armv*-*, rather than being consistent in the forms of ARM name accepted). -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com