From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6214 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2011 00:00:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 6205 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Nov 2011 00:00:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:00:44 +0000 Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=EU1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1RQ6S9-0006i1-Hp from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 16:00:41 -0800 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk ([172.16.63.104]) by EU1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:00:39 +0000 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.74) (envelope-from ) id 1RQ6S6-0007Wj-Ou; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:00:38 +0000 Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:00:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: Chris Metcalf cc: libc-ports@sourceware.org, Arnd Bergmann , Linas Vepstas , Guan Xuetao , Jonas Bonn , Chen Liqin Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1a/10] sysdeps/tile support In-Reply-To: <201111100435.pAA4ZlX3008672@farm-0002.internal.tilera.com> Message-ID: References: <201111100054.pAA0sf6u025585@farm-0002.internal.tilera.com> <201111100435.pAA4ZlX3008672@farm-0002.internal.tilera.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00043.txt.bz2 On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, Chris Metcalf wrote: > (My patch "1/10" didn't go through again; I figured it might have > been the disasm stuff in v1 patchset that caught the notice of the > spam filter, but maybe this time it was just too big an email. I'll > break it into basic tile and Linux tile support in two emails.) > > This patch is the basic tile architecture support. v2 of patch 1a is OK. Unless Roland objects, you should get write access to be maintainer of the Tile ports (and write-after-approval for other things in ports such as the "generic" Linux syscall support). > * sysdeps/tile/backtrace.c: New file. I presume you had a reason this should be a separate implementation for Tile, rather than the #include of the IA32 version that e.g. x86_64 uses. Richard Henderson's review of the TILE-Gx GCC port did request "Use the atomic_ names and interfaces." - so maybe those will be available for these ports with GCC 4.7 soon.... -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com