From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30975 invoked by alias); 6 May 2012 22:41:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 30967 invoked by uid 22791); 6 May 2012 22:41:44 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 06 May 2012 22:41:31 +0000 Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=EU1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1SRA8s-0001wR-Oy from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Sun, 06 May 2012 15:41:26 -0700 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk ([172.16.63.104]) by EU1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 6 May 2012 23:41:24 +0100 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.74) (envelope-from ) id 1SRA8r-0001Ck-KX; Sun, 06 May 2012 22:41:25 +0000 Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 22:41:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: Carlos O'Donell cc: Roland McGrath , Carlos O'Donell , Andrew Haley , libc-ports@sourceware.org, steve.mcintyre@linaro.org, michael.hope@linaro.org Subject: Re: [WIP] glibc: Use /lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3 for ARM's -mfloat-abi=hard ABI. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <4F886201.3040200@redhat.com> <4F886277.6000006@redhat.com> <20120413173512.5D52B2C074@topped-with-meat.com> <4F9515D5.60804@redhat.com> <4F99B990.7020300@mentor.com> <20120426220656.0CC302C0D3@topped-with-meat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00024.txt.bz2 On Sun, 6 May 2012, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > I'll use sysdeps/arm/configure.in and thus avoid the confdefs.h hack > in preconfigure. > > I'll post a patch shortly. Please post patches that are against current git sources, not some other version. If the ports patch depends on a libc patch, post the libc patch to libc-alpha and I'll await the conclusion of libc-alpha discussions on the approach before reviewing the ports patch. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com