From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19108 invoked by alias); 23 May 2012 08:18:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 19085 invoked by uid 22791); 23 May 2012 08:18:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from cantor2.suse.de (HELO mx2.suse.de) (195.135.220.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 May 2012 08:17:53 +0000 Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE5DC98EA8; Wed, 23 May 2012 10:17:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 08:18:00 -0000 From: Richard Guenther To: Andreas Jaeger Cc: cross-distro@lists.linaro.org, Richard Earnshaw , Carlos O'Donell , GCC Patches , "libc-ports@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Use different linker path for hardfloat ABI In-Reply-To: <201205231001.17818.aj@suse.com> Message-ID: References: <4FBC8DCB.6020006@suse.com> <4FBC982F.7040403@arm.com> <201205231001.17818.aj@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00136.txt.bz2 On Wed, 23 May 2012, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 09:56:31 Richard Earnshaw wrote: > > [...] > > This is a behaviour change. It would need RM approval for a release > > branch. > > > > R. > > There was agreement by all pushing for the change to use it. So, let's ask > the release managers about their opinion, I'm ok with the change - but of course only to carry one less patch in our local tree. What do others think? It would definitely (anyway) need documenting in changes.html (for both 4.7.1 and 4.8). Richard.