From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28518 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2012 17:00:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 28499 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jun 2012 17:00:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 17:00:30 +0000 Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=EU1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1SgfJT-0003Ml-Ml from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:00:27 -0700 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk ([172.16.63.104]) by EU1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 18 Jun 2012 18:00:26 +0100 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.74) (envelope-from ) id 1SgfJQ-0002Qs-Le; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 17:00:24 +0000 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 17:00:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: Mark Salter cc: libc-ports@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] am33: bring port up to date with NPTL support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1340030785-32581-1-git-send-email-msalter@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00069.txt.bz2 On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/am33/configure.in should change > arch_minimum_kernel to 2.6.25, the version where am33 support went into > kernel.org kernels, and you should have a kernel-features.h unless the > libc version is fully correct about when features were supported on am33. A clarification here: I think 2.6.25 is now the earliest reasonable arch_minimum_kernel for am33, but if there were any kernel features required by NPTL or other parts of the port that only went in some time after 2.6.25, then it's possible that in fact something more recent should be listed for arch_minimum_kernel. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com