From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31089 invoked by alias); 3 Jul 2012 17:05:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 31042 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jul 2012 17:05:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 17:05:11 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1Sm6XG-0004Id-F8 from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 10:05:10 -0700 Received: from SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.0.104]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 3 Jul 2012 10:05:10 -0700 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:05:08 +0100 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Sm6XD-00024z-7C; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 17:05:07 +0000 Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 17:05:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: CC: Subject: Add ppca2 to ports powerpc/dl-procinfo In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <4FF12517.1060601@archlinux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00004.txt.bz2 On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, Allan McRae wrote: > > > sysdeps/powerpc/dl-procinfo.c > > sysdeps/powerpc/dl-procinfo.h > > I hadn't realised there were files in ports that would override > corresponding files in libc when the repositories are merged (that is, if > a configuration that previously didn't use ports now has the ports > repository visible). It looks like it will be necessary to add ppca2 > support to the ports version to avoid any possible regressions - Ryan, > does this (untested) patch look OK for the ports subdirectory immediately > after the repository merge goes on master? (After the merge the powerpc > maintainers should probably move at least the CPU support bits for powerpc > in ports, if not the nofpu bits as well, directly into the libc sysdeps > structure, but that's certainly a matter for the maintainers.) I have applied this patch to hopefully reduce the risk of regressions for anyone newly getting powerpc ports files where they didn't before. Please do fix things up if this patch has in fact caused any problems of its own.... -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com