From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17228 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2012 15:58:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 17214 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Aug 2012 15:58:35 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 15:58:10 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1T0aYL-0003ev-HE from joseph_myers@mentor.com ; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 08:58:09 -0700 Received: from SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.0.104]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 12 Aug 2012 08:58:09 -0700 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 16:58:07 +0100 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1T0aYI-0001BD-8Z; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 15:58:06 +0000 Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 15:58:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: Mike Frysinger CC: Roland McGrath , Subject: Re: [PATCH] hppa: add missing prlimit64 symbol In-Reply-To: <201208121048.31823.vapier@gentoo.org> Message-ID: References: <1334271665-31914-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org> <201208111527.37505.vapier@gentoo.org> <201208121048.31823.vapier@gentoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00110.txt.bz2 On Sun, 12 Aug 2012, Mike Frysinger wrote: > if all new arches are expected to start with linux-generic as its base, then i > can see leaning towards just adding the entry to hppa and being done with it That's a kernel expectation rather than a glibc one - but while new glibc ports for old kernel ports are certainly possible, new glibc ports are more likely for new kernel ports, and new kernel ports are expected to use the generic ABI. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com