From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22362 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2013 23:59:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 22353 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jan 2013 23:59:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 23:59:15 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1U0L58-0005WF-Ju from joseph_myers@mentor.com for libc-ports@sourceware.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:59:14 -0800 Received: from SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([137.202.0.104]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:59:14 -0800 Received: from digraph.polyomino.org.uk (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-01.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.289.1; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 23:59:12 +0000 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by digraph.polyomino.org.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1U0L55-0003OD-N4; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 23:59:11 +0000 Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 23:59:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" CC: Subject: Re: [PATCH][BZ #15054] MIPS: Fix syscall wrappers for syscall restart support In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Mailing-List: contact libc-ports-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-ports-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00080.txt.bz2 On Tue, 29 Jan 2013, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > Here's a new version of the syscall wrappers fix, posted because I > decided to make a further adjustment throughout, that is to parenthesize > "number", following commit f59cba71d8486e4749742f1a703424a08a2be8a7. I > hope I got the formatting right with this change. I made no further > changes beyond this and ones you previously requested. OK in this form? You still need to correct the spacing with __attribute__ in the n32 version of the file. OK with that change. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com